Same Sex Marriage-
The government is always trying to be less discriminative towards non-whites, and non-Americans, but with same sex marriage being illegal in most states they are discriminating against non-straights. As the citizens of America we grow up being taught to not discriminate against people because they are different then us, and same sex marriage being illegal is doing the exact opposite.The United States church and government are supposed to be separated, but in this case they are not. The government is being unfair and although same sex marriage goes against most religious views, the government should not have a say over whether same sex couples can be married.
Drinking Age-
The United States has one of the highest drinking ages, some countries do not have drinking ages at all because there is no need for them. The government thinks that by having the drinking age at 21 it will be better for the country which in fact it is not. Underage drinking happens and everyone knows whether they want to or not. The fact that underage teens will get in trouble for drinking they hide it which can be more dangerous to their safety. The government also thinks that by having a higher drinking age their will be a lower death rate due to drunk driving accidents, but instead of not allowing teens to drink the government should be making the public especially the teens aware of the dangers of drunk driving and have more severe consequences for drunk driving.
Censorship in Music-
Although there should be some blocks on what is allowed to be said in songs, the rules should not be as strict as they are. The government tries to hide the real world to people, so when a new song comes out they have to make sure they are appropriate for all ages and what they want the public to hear. Artists have to make a version of a song, and if the song wants to be played on the radio they have to change it and yes they can sell the unedited version, but sometimes songs are completely changed because you are not allowed to curse in them. Cursing happens, and so does almost everything else that artists sing about in their songs, but if the government thinks it is not suitable for the public they have to make a censored version of the song.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Article Summaries
In Nicholas Carr's article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" he is talking about how although many people are actually reading more than before, they are interpreting and reading the material in a different way because of the internet. Nicholas Carr is saying how the way we research and use the internet to do everything is changing the way people think, because instead of having to research with books, they just go online and can go from site to site in matters of seconds. People believe that our brains used to work like clockwork but now that we use the computer and the internet so often they are working like computers. Neuroscientists say that our brains change at a biological level when adapting to new technologies. The internet is now used for almost all the other technologies we need, like a tv, clock, calculator and others. The way the internet sends us the information it scatters our brains to different things at once and makes ours concentration levels really low. Nicholas Carr is stating that Google, wants to be the "perfect search engine" so they can give the people using it exactly what they want faster than anything else would be able to, in order to make people think and read information faster. The owners of Google, want to make a search engine that can take the place of the human brain, because they think the brain is like an outdated computer.
In Chris Hedge's article, "The Internet is No Substitution for the Dying Newspaper Industry" is about how the internet is not going to save the newspaper industry. Chris Hedge is saying that although almost all newspapers have websites they are still doing bad because the internet is only bringing in a small portion of the revenue for the newspaper. The internet is challenging the way people get news, because if they are reading online instead of watching the news or reading the newspaper they go to sites that agree with their beliefs. Chris Hedge says that about 80 percent of reporting is done by newspaper and wire service, so without them we would be missing something. The news gives us all the information even if we do not agree with it, unlike blogs who say the writers opinion and two different blogs about the same topic can be completely different because of the writers opinion and because they are free to write what they want and can not get in trouble for it, like newspaper writers would. When readers read the New York Times online they are not reading completely they are browsing and skimming. The corporate companies in the United States are controlling the news, and they would rather not have the citizens hear the real news because that would lead to them asking questions. The companies are making the news amusing and entertaining instead of informational and boring.
I agree with both authors of these articles, because I do believe that the internet is changing the way we think and process information. Although I think it is changing us I think it is for the better not for the worse. I believe that people know more than they would without the internet because even if they aren't looking for information they learn things about topics they weren't looking up because of headlines, and advertisements on the pages they are reading. Although people are not reading the articles and research completely they are skimming and getting through more articles than they would if they had to do research with books and without the internet's help. I also agree with Nicholas Carr that the computer is taking the place of many of our other technologies, instead of using a calculator, you can type a math eqaution into google and it gives you an answer which is sometimes faster than using an actual calculator. The internet is used by many people to watch tv shows that they missed, you can find almost any tv show online, which in the past you would have had to remember to set a vcr to record the show. In my opinion the internet is helping people read and find out news and things that are happening in the society, because there are more people that will read the news on the internet because they saw something about it on another website they were on, then go out and get an actual newspaper. I disagree with Nicholas Carr because I don't think the internet is something that is bad because yes it is changing the way people process information because they don't read full articles. I don't read the newspaper because the articles are too long and annoying to read, but I would skim through articles online to learn what is going on in our society.
In Chris Hedge's article, "The Internet is No Substitution for the Dying Newspaper Industry" is about how the internet is not going to save the newspaper industry. Chris Hedge is saying that although almost all newspapers have websites they are still doing bad because the internet is only bringing in a small portion of the revenue for the newspaper. The internet is challenging the way people get news, because if they are reading online instead of watching the news or reading the newspaper they go to sites that agree with their beliefs. Chris Hedge says that about 80 percent of reporting is done by newspaper and wire service, so without them we would be missing something. The news gives us all the information even if we do not agree with it, unlike blogs who say the writers opinion and two different blogs about the same topic can be completely different because of the writers opinion and because they are free to write what they want and can not get in trouble for it, like newspaper writers would. When readers read the New York Times online they are not reading completely they are browsing and skimming. The corporate companies in the United States are controlling the news, and they would rather not have the citizens hear the real news because that would lead to them asking questions. The companies are making the news amusing and entertaining instead of informational and boring.
I agree with both authors of these articles, because I do believe that the internet is changing the way we think and process information. Although I think it is changing us I think it is for the better not for the worse. I believe that people know more than they would without the internet because even if they aren't looking for information they learn things about topics they weren't looking up because of headlines, and advertisements on the pages they are reading. Although people are not reading the articles and research completely they are skimming and getting through more articles than they would if they had to do research with books and without the internet's help. I also agree with Nicholas Carr that the computer is taking the place of many of our other technologies, instead of using a calculator, you can type a math eqaution into google and it gives you an answer which is sometimes faster than using an actual calculator. The internet is used by many people to watch tv shows that they missed, you can find almost any tv show online, which in the past you would have had to remember to set a vcr to record the show. In my opinion the internet is helping people read and find out news and things that are happening in the society, because there are more people that will read the news on the internet because they saw something about it on another website they were on, then go out and get an actual newspaper. I disagree with Nicholas Carr because I don't think the internet is something that is bad because yes it is changing the way people process information because they don't read full articles. I don't read the newspaper because the articles are too long and annoying to read, but I would skim through articles online to learn what is going on in our society.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Vandalism or School Prank?

Seaford, Ny- Local school officials get police involved to figure out which students did a prank of covering the school's lawn with pumpkins.
In today's society pranks done on school grounds by seniors are happening more and more. The seniors feel they have to out do the past seniors, so they will be remembered for years to come. Some schools do nothing about school pranks because they know the kids are just doing it to be remembered and to leave their mark on their school. In other cases like Seaford High School the officals feel that if they let this prank go the pranks will get worse year by year and they do not want to have vandalism or things to make the school look bad in their neighborhood.
Local school's seniors take pranking to a whole new level, they covered the entire school's lawn with pumpkins. School officials are taking these acts very serious and want to punish the culprits greatly. "They will be suspended for a month, and have to clean up the mess they made, and do community service," said School's Principal. We got to interview some of the kids from the school, one being a senior "I don't know who did it but it was just a prank that they want to be remembered for, none of what was done has caused permanent damaged, so I don't see the big deal, " Said Joe, Senior.
The police are questioning all students, and parents of the seniors to see if their children were home the night the incident happened. When we asked parents opinions they agree that it was a harmless crime and noone should get in trouble for this, it's like suspending someone a whole month for starting a food fight. The school officials are being completely harsh with their punishment, and maybe if they weren't going to have such a problem then they seniors who have done this would come forward.
The seniors just thought it was going to be a prank to be remembered by and did not realize everyone was going to take it so serious. Students from the school say that the seniors do a prank every year and they get in trouble for it but not as serious as this year, and this year's prank is not as bad as some of the other years, because all they have to do is take the pumpkins away. In the past students have spray painted the lawns and let animals loose in the building during school hours, and thouse students only got in school suspension for a week or two at most. The officials figure if they show the students they are taking the pranks done to the school very serious then the students will be less likely to do one in the following years.
The students of the school feel that the principal is going overboard and making the prank a bigger deal than they should, noone got hurt and there was no permenant damage to the school inside or outside.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
The Onion Review
After reading several stories from The Onion, the stories are funny articles because instead of looking at stuff from the journalism view they look at it completely different and put a different spin on everything. One story about Derek Jeter, and his 2,722 career hit instead of looking at it as he passed a great baseball player, to make it more amusing The Onion wrote about how he was 12 dozen hits less than another player, and that everyone was celebrating Derek Jeter still being behind him. The Onion takes stories or people who are in the public eye at a certain point in time and make satire articles about them so people can know whats going on but with a spin on it, that isn't really going on and makes it interesting to read.
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Amanda's life and Times
Fatal Car Accident, Friends Remember Teenage Girl’s Life
By: Amanda Wright
Later on Sunday night, all of Jamie’s friends and family gathered at the scene of the accident, they lit candles and brought flowers in memory of Jamie. Even though they knew it was illegal it didn’t stop anyone from writing messages to Jamie, on the parking curbs. The night of the accident Jamie had won a nemo stuffed animal from the carnival, so that was put at the memorial for her, along with pictures of her and things that reminded Jamie’s friends of her.
By: Amanda Wright
July 10th, 2006
Seaford-Early Sunday morning, young girl driving east on Sunrise Highway, hits teenage girl, Jamie, and flees the scene, friends gather to mourn the loss of their friend.“She was the nicest girl anyone knew and I just don’t know why this had to happen to her” said Amanda Wright
Early Sunday morning, Jamie Carbonell was in a hit and run accident after spending the night at a church carnival with all her friends. After Jamie walked one of her friends to the train station to make sure they got home ok, she was crossing sunrise highway, when a 20 year old women hit Jamie and sent her flying in the air and landing 20 feet from where she had been hit. Jamie was with two friends, L.A and Jamal, who had to witness one of the very close friends die. Jamie was dead on impact and there was nothing they could do for her. Minutes after the accident, Gonzo, friend was on scene and he was the brave on to call Ruth, Jamie’s mother to let her know about the accident.
Later that morning, after Jamie’s friends found out about the accident, they all gathered at Jamie’s house to remember her. The friends were trying to comfort, Jamie’s siblings as well as L.A and Jamal, because none of them could have imagine how they would feel if they saw the accident and knew they couldn’t have done anything to save her.
That night they all went to the same church carnival they had been at for every night the past week, but no one was happy and no one could do anything but think about the night before when Jamie was with them, and she was trying to fix everyone else’s problems. “All I could think about was how the night before Jamie was here with us and she was trying to calm me down, because I had been fighting with my boyfriend,” said Amanda Wright, “She was always there to help when anyone needed it and she would always comfort you and tell you everything is going to work out.” All of Jamie’s friends had the same thoughts and feelings about her and they were all saying that they couldn’t believe something so bad could happen to someone so nice. The only reason Jamie was crossing the street that late was because she wanted to make sure someone else got home ok, she was always putting others before herself.
Later on Sunday night, all of Jamie’s friends and family gathered at the scene of the accident, they lit candles and brought flowers in memory of Jamie. Even though they knew it was illegal it didn’t stop anyone from writing messages to Jamie, on the parking curbs. The night of the accident Jamie had won a nemo stuffed animal from the carnival, so that was put at the memorial for her, along with pictures of her and things that reminded Jamie’s friends of her. All of Jamie’s friends wether they had been friends before knowing Jamie, or they were just meeting each other because they had Jamie as a common friend, where all there to help condole each other. “I remember trying not to cry because all my friends were hysterically crying and I knew they needed someone to be strong,” said Amanda Wright “But after a while I couldn’t help it and next thing I knew my friends brother was hugging me and telling me everything was going to be ok.”
Friends of Jamie said they will never forget her and that their lives will not be the same without being able to see her smile, or talk to her about their problems, or be able to get one of her hugs that just made everyone’s problems ok for a little while
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Remebering Jamie
In July 2006 I had a tragic event happen, one of my very close girl friends, Jamie was hit and killed in a hit and run accident. I remember being at work on a Sunday morning, and when I went on my break I had like 10 missed calls, and 2 or 3 messages. When I called my voicemail the first was from my friend Teash, saying to call her as soon as I could, and the other was from my brother saying something happened and to call him on Vinny's phone as soon as I could. So the first thought that came to my mind was that something happened to Vinny and that's why my brother told me to call his phone, but when I called my brother he told me that our friend Jamie had been hit by a car and died at first I didn't believe him and I was like no way could that have happened. So after going back to work for 2 more hours, and when my mom picked me up and brought me home, the first thing I did was called my other friends and everyone was at Jamie's house so I got changed and walked over to her house. This was when I found out the details, on where, and when she was hit, I also found out that my friends L.A and Jamal were with her and saw the whole thing happen. Jamie was hit by a girl in her mid-twenties and she drove away after hitt
ing her, we don't know why but the girl for some reason came back to the scene hours later, and was put under arrest after claiming she didn't see Jamie as she was crossing the street. The accident happened around 12 on Saturday night, and after the driver claimed she didn't see Jamie, she said that she saw L.A which still to this day doesn't make sense because Jamie was white and L.A was black so if you saw either of them you would see the white one, not the black one. The driver was speeding to make matters worse, and not only was jamie hit, she flew 30 feet and when she hit the ground she died on impact. July 9th was one of the worst days of my life, because I had become close with Jamie in the past 3 or 4 months, but for some reason my group of friends would exclude her when we went out sometimes, and looking back on it we all felt so bad. On July 8th there was a carnival at the church, around the block from where she was hit, and we were all there hanging out together and I remember when I went to leave I was saying goodbye to everyone, and I hadn't said goodbye to Jamie and I was about to leave, but something in me made me turn around and say goodbye to her, and I remember giving her a hug and saying I'll see you tommorrow. Looking back on that night I was so happy I said goodbye to her otherwise I would have missed saying goodbye to her and never had the chance to. The next few days were hard, because there was the wakes, the mass, and the funeral, my whole group of friends went to all of them, and it was so sad to see everyone crying and wishing that she was there with us instead of us being there because of her. The worst part of the accident was that Jamie was the nicest person I ever knew, and it just sucked that it had to happen to someone who was such a good person. Jamie died when she was only 19 years old, she had so much time to live and she would have done great things in her life.
ing her, we don't know why but the girl for some reason came back to the scene hours later, and was put under arrest after claiming she didn't see Jamie as she was crossing the street. The accident happened around 12 on Saturday night, and after the driver claimed she didn't see Jamie, she said that she saw L.A which still to this day doesn't make sense because Jamie was white and L.A was black so if you saw either of them you would see the white one, not the black one. The driver was speeding to make matters worse, and not only was jamie hit, she flew 30 feet and when she hit the ground she died on impact. July 9th was one of the worst days of my life, because I had become close with Jamie in the past 3 or 4 months, but for some reason my group of friends would exclude her when we went out sometimes, and looking back on it we all felt so bad. On July 8th there was a carnival at the church, around the block from where she was hit, and we were all there hanging out together and I remember when I went to leave I was saying goodbye to everyone, and I hadn't said goodbye to Jamie and I was about to leave, but something in me made me turn around and say goodbye to her, and I remember giving her a hug and saying I'll see you tommorrow. Looking back on that night I was so happy I said goodbye to her otherwise I would have missed saying goodbye to her and never had the chance to. The next few days were hard, because there was the wakes, the mass, and the funeral, my whole group of friends went to all of them, and it was so sad to see everyone crying and wishing that she was there with us instead of us being there because of her. The worst part of the accident was that Jamie was the nicest person I ever knew, and it just sucked that it had to happen to someone who was such a good person. Jamie died when she was only 19 years old, she had so much time to live and she would have done great things in her life.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Blogging Articles
Michael Skube writes about how bloggers should not be considered journalists. He says that journalism is not just a hobby like blogging is for most people. Michael Skube feels that blogging is hurting the journalism and reporting fields. The article describes how blogging is becoming more and more popular, and that the blogs are a side hobby that bloggers do and they are very opinionated. Another journalist finds it very strange that the bloggers are mostly blogging for free and doesn't understand why anyone would write for free. Bloggers feel that they are a new kind a journalist that give opinions and their views not only the politically "right" views. Bloggers are challenging journalism and politics with their blogs, because they can write about what ever they want and do not have to adhere to any of the rules that journalist that write for newspapers have to. A famous journalist Lasch, once wrote that what democracy needs is a debate, not information like facts and numbers but what people think about and their opinions and ideas. This was written before blogging had occurred, and bloggers agree with it completely. Michael Skube on the other hand feels that the blogging sensation and their ideas and opinions are less important than Lasch had said they would be. Michael Skube feels that blogging should not be considered journalism because journalists and reporters face dangers to get their information and that they spend much more time on an article than a blogger does on a blog post. Bloggers do not check their facts like journalists have to because to bloggers their opinions are more important then the facts.
Michael Skube's article and Andrew Sullivan's article are both about blogging and how it is changing the journalism field, but their views on blogging are completely opposite. Andrew Sullivan is a blogger, and also a journalist for the New York Times, but he feels that blogging is the more important one because he gets to express his opinion without having to be politically correct. Michael Skube is a writer for the Los Angeles Times, and believes that blogging is hurting the journalism field because articles need facts not opinions. Andrew Sullivan feels that news articles are opinionated but factual opinions because if the writer's opinions were in the story then the article would not be a editorial. The articles are still opinionated though because the writer can pick the facts that only support his ideas and leave out the ones that oppose him ideas. The two men both agree that blogs are very opinionated, one-minded, and the bloggers emotions towards the topics are very known to the readers.
I agree with Andrew Sullivan more than Michael Skube, although he makes some good points. In my opinion Andrew Sullivan's argument is better because it is better to know other's opinions on certain matters, especially because if you read a news article they are harder to read because it is all facts. With news articles you also have to pick out the facts and you would never get both sides of a story from 1 news article. I feel that blogging is helping the journalism field, and the country because people can get their thoughts out their for others to see without having to pay a lot of money and without having to have someone else agree and think that their thoughts will make money.
Michael Skube's article and Andrew Sullivan's article are both about blogging and how it is changing the journalism field, but their views on blogging are completely opposite. Andrew Sullivan is a blogger, and also a journalist for the New York Times, but he feels that blogging is the more important one because he gets to express his opinion without having to be politically correct. Michael Skube is a writer for the Los Angeles Times, and believes that blogging is hurting the journalism field because articles need facts not opinions. Andrew Sullivan feels that news articles are opinionated but factual opinions because if the writer's opinions were in the story then the article would not be a editorial. The articles are still opinionated though because the writer can pick the facts that only support his ideas and leave out the ones that oppose him ideas. The two men both agree that blogs are very opinionated, one-minded, and the bloggers emotions towards the topics are very known to the readers.
I agree with Andrew Sullivan more than Michael Skube, although he makes some good points. In my opinion Andrew Sullivan's argument is better because it is better to know other's opinions on certain matters, especially because if you read a news article they are harder to read because it is all facts. With news articles you also have to pick out the facts and you would never get both sides of a story from 1 news article. I feel that blogging is helping the journalism field, and the country because people can get their thoughts out their for others to see without having to pay a lot of money and without having to have someone else agree and think that their thoughts will make money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
